People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Logic , the origin of every action and reaction that takes places in the universe,. It is human tendancy to find logic behind every other thing happening aroud us. The topic states that people who tend to make decisions based on emotions and then defend their decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. I somewhat agree with the following statement based on the following three reasons.

First of all, I beleive that every decision should be backed up by logic. There should be strong reasoning behind every choice that an individual makes. There are certain decisions and actions that cannot be left to chance. As a student, I strongly agree with this opinion, there comes a certain point in a student's lifetime when an individual is perplexed by the choices of carreers that one has. If he chosses a path without ruminating upon, whether it would be beneficial for him/her and just goes with his emotions that he liked one path at a certain point of time, yhis could harm the individual at a later stage as it was didin't thought through. Of course, one would defend their choice corroborating it with some logic, that it was the best path with best carreer growth at that time, which is open for interpretation. Hence, it is clear that the person who make decisions based on emotions and logic are not good decision makers.

Secondly, it's not necessary that one's emotions are reflected by the other individuals. There is a chance that one's decision based on his logic might adversely harm their beneficiaries. One might want to send their parents to an old age home because they are not aligning with decision maker objectives. This is a clear example when one based out of their emotions and biasness send their parents somewhere where they don't like. Based out of logic, they could have allowed their parents to stay somewhere else according to their own choice, where they like. Also, there is a chance that those old age parents with life long decsion making experience might have been able to help the individual with something convoluted in their life. Later in time, when they realize their mistake, individuals can only justify their decision based on some random logic that parents were hindering their growth, which shows poor decision making process.

At the same time, I would also like to state that they are not always wrong, something the conditions are such when an individual is bewildered by the surrounding and his/her thinking capacity is curbed due to some reason. Some decsions are to be made by heart and not always mind and sometimes they prone to be good. For example, decisions take out of love for somebody without logic might benefit the other person for whom the decision is made. Parents without thinking about the financial conditions and just out of love for their children send them overseas, away from their home for studies, so that theri children could hava a better future. This represents a decision taken out of emotions, which in later stage could benefit both the parents, when their children returns with a bag ful of experiences and knowledge, and for the receiver as well with the great deify.

In the end, I beleive the issue is very complex to land on any one side. There's a chance that sometimes these decisions based out of emotions might be beneficial for everybody and at other times they might only benefit the decision maker or at the worst nobody, in that case it is clearly poor decision making.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
2023-08-26 vishva24 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user akshatkaush :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Logic , the origin of every action and reaction...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...action that takes places in the universe,. It is human tendancy to find logic behi...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...inion, there comes a certain point in a students lifetime when an individual is perplexe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...send their parents somewhere where they dont like. Based out of logic, they could ha...
^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...s very complex to land on any one side. Theres a chance that sometimes these decisions...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, of course, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 31.0 11.3162921348 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2884.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 596.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8389261745 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40855528887 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444630872483 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.0 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0007724086 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.36 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.84 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32259096461 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104154750142 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979812841362 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211490277991 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603226675063 0.0667264976115 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.