A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.
Crimes are the illegal aspects of the society and humanity. If they are done with the full intention of the wrong-doer. it is a serious culprit which not only questions the existence of laws but also morality within the society. But crime, either wittingly or unwittingly done, should be penalized according to the laws formulated on the basis of it's severity and it's impact on the society. I am not fully convinced with the author's claim on the statement. A person has a right to retain his civil rights and right to benefit from his or her own labour after he is captivated.
Crimes indicate the downfall of the norms and values existed in the society. If a person commits any crime, he is surely against the country's rules and socials morals which are very needed to make peace and well being in the society. So, it's necessary to provide penalty in accordance to the laws and in accordance to his severity of crimes. For example; A rapist and a simple thief are different in the nature of their crimes and penalty should be different. A rapist may be strongly penalized in a puritanical society- in this context, he cannot get any civil rights and right to benefit from his own labour after being punished. It might be seem justifiable because it helps to reduce such hideous acts in the future. If such strong penalty are not given, people may not care rules and norms of the society and they will go beyong the established rules and regulations. Also, these sorts of penalty will preclude these sorts of crimes in the future.
However, all crimes are not same. It will be baseless to provide same type of penalty to all types of crimes. People should enjoy their civil rights and rights to benefit from his or her own labour after they get their own punishment. After punishment, they realized their mistake and often they takes the right path. In this circumstances, if they are not provided with their rights, it questions the existence of humanity. The punishment which are given, are basically aimed to help them build mentally and socially developed. But if they cannot enjoy their rights after they get their punishment, will seriously hamper in their mental and social development. For example, there are lots of minor cases in the police custody. If all of them are treated harshly, then how can we dream of better and humane society? It will seriously affect our society and nation. For example: if all the wrong doers are bereft of civil right like voting, it will seriously hamper our democracy and eventually in our national economy too.
Many might argue that crimes weaken our society, so the wrong doer should be penalized harshly and should not be given civil rights. But just keeping them away from the civil rights will just create the feeling of alienation in the same country. And such punishment will not always ensure these crimes will not be repeated in future.
In this way, it is concluded that crimes, with respect to it's severity should be penalized. All crimes are not of similar nature. So it is not necessary that a guilty should be devoid of this civil rights or benefits from his or own labour after getting the proper punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...al aspects of the society and humanity. If they are done with the full intention o...
^^
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...h the full intention of the wrong-doer. it is a serious culprit which not only que...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...y realized their mistake and often they takes the right path. In this circumstances, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and often they takes the right path. In this circumstances, if they are not provided...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...entually in our national economy too. Many might argue that crimes weaken our society, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nsure these crimes will not be repeated in future. In this way, it is concluded that cr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2625.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73826714801 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42348267083 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420577617329 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2038286998 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6774193548 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8709677419 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35483870968 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307599667093 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781988768511 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113755610959 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201049583799 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463514766635 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.