Power prep 2
Young people are the harbinger of a society's good future. Ensuring the germane knowledge and development for such people so that they can lead the future generation are a must. In the prompt, the author states that during the preparation phase of such young people, it is urgent to help them learn about cooperation rather than competition. I strongly concur with the statement mainly due to two reasons and cooperation over competition is highly needed for a better future.
We live in a world based on democracy. Up until 19th centure, dictatorship was prevalent and such government was devoid of egalitarian conditions. For instance, if we see Hitler's reign during the initial period of 20th century, there was little to none cooperation. Absolute despotic government was pertinent and surely that became a major scandal in the human history. What was the failure of such reign of dictatorship? Surely no availability of cooperation rather the competative mind of Hitler to take over the whole world under his reign eventually became his downfall. And if we observe the oppositions of Hitler's reign, the cooperation between different countries during the World War resulted in stable democracy througout the world. Thus, if young people are instlilled to learn about competition rather than cooperation, is it not following the footsteps of Hitler's ideology to remain the sole controler? Thus for e democratic country to ensure marvelous future. The importance of cooperation cannot be denied and such preparation should be instilled from a young age.
Moreever, humans are not alone. Every step in a person's life requires much help from another person. From early childhood when parents literally help a child grow up to a full grown adult where cooperative skill required in even small institutional jobs. For instance, during the prehistoric era human did not survive alone. Group cooperating during hunting and gathering is an incontrovertible truth. Just by working together prehistoric humans could take down an entire mamoth for hunting, an animal that is many times stronger and larger than an average human. Would humanity still exist if this kind of cooperation wasn't prevalent? Thus, cooperation is axiomatic in todays society. To buid up a country's future very little achievemet can be possible without cooperation. Even leadership skill of a person is ultimately connected with cooperatinve skill to gather the knowledge from his comtemporaries and instill them in the project they are working on. And running a government is a larger scale of this cooperatioin.
Perhaps, some could say competition may coerce to ensure greater skill of a person. But what will be the importance of individual growth for a democratic country? Even a ruler have to first consider the country's prosperity over individual satisfaction. Does this not urge the need for knowledge of cooperation over competition?
In conclusion, cooperation between humans became a evolutionary advantage throughout the years. Humankind stand where it is now solely due to cooperation. And in such mordern times emphasizing on competition may have huge detrimental effect. Thus, the prompt is absolutely right in concluding that just by instilling greater cooperative skills and urge young people to stay clear of competetion a country or society can ensure prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | Wasif Ajwad | 16 | view |
- Power prep 2 16
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 58
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 916, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... ideology to remain the sole controler? Thus for e democratic country to ensure marv...
^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
..., humans are not alone. Every step in a persons life requires much help from another pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...still exist if this kind of cooperation wasnt prevalent? Thus, cooperation is axiomat...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sion, cooperation between humans became a evolutionary advantage throughout the y...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 33.0 12.9106741573 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2831.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35160680529 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02021188181 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531190926276 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 897.3 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.789518976 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7878787879 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0303030303 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.24242424242 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.