History has witnessed countless revolutionaries who strive to deliver their contrasting messages to the authority. These revolutions have pushed the human race to a more harmonious, more modern society. No matter it's the Industrial Revolution, the French Revolution, or the very recent A4 Revolution in China, all have liberated some parts of human population to a great extent. Therefore, it is fair to say that progress is best made through communication among people of different opinions.
Only contrasting opinions can initiate ponderous reflections. It is only when people encounter starkly different views do they struggle to gather evidence in defense of their own view. If their own opinions are widely supported by others around them, they will not bother to rethink their statement or meticulously prove it. For example, Mao Zedong, once the chair of an authoritarian country, wrongly started the Cultural Revolution which aimed to destroy all intellectual properties in China because no one in the government dared to oppose him. Without contrasting ideas, Mao couldn't reflect upon his regime and thus made the disastrous mistake. In contrast, the U.S. government, facing the mass demonstrations against its racial discriminatory policies enacted by former president Trump, now decides to loosen its grip on people of color because it realizes the potential threats to the country underlying its previous policies with the help of opposing opinions from the public.
Expanding on this, it is only through the transaction of different ideas that people can form better solutions. It may be hard to think of a brilliant solution to a dilemma by one person. However, selecting beneficial ideas from opposing sides and combining them together, one can form a cornucopia of resources and adapt them more fittingly to the complex situations. The United Kingdom, for example, is made up of multiple parties that contribute their opposing ideas to the country. Despite their arguments, the government eventually considers all aspects of the opposing ideas and selects the best ones to combine. Therefore, the government can make a relatively beneficial decision for the society as a whole. Similarly, in the field of science, Newton had to take into account of the different hypotheses as to why we stand erect on earth before he could finally come up with his experiment and prove his theories. Without the inspiration from different ideas, right or wrong they might be, an individual can hardly have the creativity to think of a practical solution.
Admittedly, it is true that when a group of people want to reach a certain goal, it may be best for them to reconcile their differences first and present a unified goal toward the authority. For instance, a revolutionary group is unlikely to succeed if they constantly yell different proposals to the government. However, it is worthy to notice that without at least one opposing force, in this case, the government, it is nearly impossible to form a strong opinion in the very first place, in this case, the revolutionary group. Only with contrasting views at hand first can we initiate progress. Unifying different ideas in a progressive group is merely a reform tool to achieve success; it does not contrast with the cardinal need of progress which is possessing a variety of voices.
Therefore, it is best for us to think outside of the box and try to absorb contrasting views whenever we make a decision. It might sound absurd at first, but it is only the differences that make our society more prone to progress.
- Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered 66
- The speaker states that it is sometimes necessary and desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public 83
- The following memorandum is from the manager of Bagel Mania Bakery Recently Bagel Mania replaced sugar with saccharin a sugar substitute throughout its bakeries in the Northeast areas of the USA Contrary to initial expectations this change did not have an 66
- Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm 66
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...monious, more modern society. No matter its the Industrial Revolution, the French R...
^^^
Line 2, column 579, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ose him. Without contrasting ideas, Mao couldnt reflect upon his regime and thus made t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 752, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ith the cardinal need of progress which is possessing a variety of voices. Therefore, it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, as to, at least, for example, for instance, in contrast, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2999.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1529209622 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92878727477 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524054982818 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7619812255 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.96 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.28 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212820029935 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604787641166 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718706084389 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127331934506 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600746099897 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.