School should do more to prepare students for the non-academic aspects of adulthood.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation
and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup porting your position, be sure
to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
Schools provide the quintessential education to an individual and focus mainly on the academic prospects of the individual. It also pays attention to extra curricular activities, however, that attention is not equitable. It should also include the non-academic aspects for building a ground for dealing with the other aspects of life. Such a process is tedious and costly.
Often, an individual faces challenges with time management. This is because we are not able to decide which task needs extra importance than others. This qualifies an individual as a stressed adult, which disrupts his personal and professional life. Schools should have sessions on time and stress management, not just as a extra class, but should also be leveraged upon. Schools can also make it mandatory to have sessions on career counselling which are to be taken by every individual. This will help those students who cannot afford to go to a college for higher studies. Schools should also provide classes to develop interpersonal skills to help promote healthy relationships.
However, non-academic aspects are innumerable and schools cannot focus on all of those aspects. It becomes a challenge to cater to such a plethora of knowledge and skills. Also, there are less number of professionals who deal with these aspects in a school level. The cost required to maintain such facilities will also be enormous and this will in turn increase the fees of the students. This will make the elementary education an unaffordable commodity for the working classes.
Therefore, it is important to address these non-academic aspects from school level itself. However, it is difficult on the part of the school to cater to such a vast range of aspects and also for the students to afford such a pricey education. However, certain non-academic aspects should be dealt with in every school and services should be made available to those who want to pursue the knowledge of other non-academic aspects of life that will help then in shaping a better future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | Sakshi Jain | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Gnyana | 58 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Newmember_69 | 58 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Christiana Longe | 33 | view |
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
- School should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...time and stress management, not just as a extra class, but should also be leverag...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15454545455 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87829182329 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1971595309 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5263157895 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3684210526 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26315789474 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207483312922 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669779455377 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554245738085 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143247913897 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352588242862 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.