Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
The huge opportunity science and technology has brought us cannot be downplayed. We now have access to the Internet and can surf and gain knowledge about any field from the comfort of our homes, solving lots of problems that would take twice or triple the amount of time without technology. However, I mostly disagree with the prompt thst science and technology will one day solve all or problems with two reasons.
Can science and technology really solve all of the society's problems? Let's take a moment to analyze some of the society's problem we find today. Take for instance, the aspect of marriage. A lot of marriages break everyday from a lack of communication, couples spend more time on their devices than talking to one another, while technology might not be the only cause of this breakups, the extent to which it affects a couple's communication is debatable. In certain marriages, the use of technology has caused more problems rather than good. On the World wide web, we hear of examples of how the use of a marital book and following an advice found on the internet has saved a marriage. Although we can agreeably say the appropriate use of technology has saved some marriages, it is debatable to agree that it can one day save all.
Secondly, Let's take a look at the educational system, Science and technology has advanced the patterns and ways in which students learn, we now have computers and the opportunity for students to now read books on their devices from the comfort of their home instead of making a trip to the library. Thus, we can agree that science and technology plays a big role in the educational system. However, the extent to which the use of technology has helped students and the impact it has made on their grades, is debatable. During study sessions, students spend more time playing video games, than they spend working on that maths problem that they have for homework, or while they ought to spend more time studying, they spend it watching the latest TV show airing on the modern and comfortable TV that science and technology has afforded us. While we can say that science has definitely made the educational system easier, with devices such as a computer and mobile phones, it is arguable to believe that this has caused more problems in the society than good. Students who spend most of their time on their devices on activities that do not improve their grades end up dropping out of school in extreme cases and becoming a problem to the society rather than a blessing. In this case, science and technology cannot solely be blamed for the pitfalls in the educational system, but this plays a role in the lives of some students lack of seriousness with their education.
In summary, there are a lot of cases where science can help and cases where science has done more harm than good. More research has to be done to irrevocably conclude that it can solve all society's problems.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 65
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The best test of an argument is the argument s ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to wide 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...Can science and technology really solve all of the societys problems? Lets take a moment t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...lly solve all of the societys problems? Lets take a moment to analyze some of the so...
^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...problems? Lets take a moment to analyze some of the societys problem we find today. Take fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...t of marriage. A lot of marriages break everyday from a lack of communication, couples s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...chnology might not be the only cause of this breakups, the extent to which it affect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'couples'' or 'couple's'?
Suggestion: couples'; couple's
...akups, the extent to which it affects a couples communication is debatable. In certain ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
... games, than they spend working on that maths problem that they have for homework, or...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74901960784 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54818991022 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435294117647 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5474387636 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.473684211 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8421052632 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195870598196 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779953203845 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606076969631 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139906742887 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405023510941 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.