The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its
rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Welfarism is an intricate part of a nation in which measures a nations economic condition and how its role in standard of living of every citizen. The prompt suggests that the welfare of a nation is the greatest indicator of its status as a great nation. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the fact that a nation is noted as “great” based on its citizen welfarism for three reasons.
Firstly, what is the relevance of rulers, artist and scientist achievement if it has no positive significance on the citizens welfarism. In a nation where the elite achievements are basically restricted within their circle and has no relevance on the overall welfarism of its nation. For example, a nation that produces scientist who discovered a great cure for an epidemic disease and monetize this cure such that it is accessible to other nations recognized as a worthwhile achievement whereas, the citizens of such nation can barely afford this vaccine, hence, a major decline in their welfare dur to this. This scenario indicates that such nation is far from being great because the citizens are lacking.
More so, a great nation encourages immigration of foreign nationals due to an opportunity of an enhanced standard of living. Most immigrant tends to move to a new country due to prospect of such country in enhancing their standard of living. Most developing nations tends to migrate to developed nations in a bid to settle in a country where their welfarism will be adequately enhanced. This is a major consideration for immigrants and not the achievements of the rulers, artists and scientist. This critically shows that a nation is considered great and worthy of migrating to if its citizen welfarism is a priority.
Perhaps, it could be argued that a country like Jamaica is rated globally due to the world record set by sportsman, however, has that served as a major source of migration to the country? It didn’t facilitate other nationals to relocate to this country because it is not a yardstick for measurement of great nation. Therefore, great nations like USA, Japan, United Kingdoms are considered great due to their contribution in providing adequate welfarism to their citizens which will foster artist and scientist achievement, thus, making a ruler competent and attain overall achievement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-01 | student193044 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | wendyz2396 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 57
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 70
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendations and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...cate part of a nation in which measures a nations economic condition and how its role in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...great nation. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the fact that a nation is noted as “great” based on i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
... it has no positive significance on the citizens welfarism. In a nation where the elite ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h that it is accessible to other nations recognized as a worthwhile achievement w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06824146982 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90313867904 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475065616798 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3249994338 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252743609043 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108220839247 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643967764855 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180051563296 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647365715362 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.