Teacher’s salary should decided on the basis of student’s academic performance.
This statement suggests that teacher’s salary should decided on
the basis of student’s academic performance. This statement
seems to be very tempting because anyone would like to
implement this kind of thing in the Education system. However, I
would like to present some point of differences from my side.
Firstly, teacher’s salary cannot be decided on the basis of
academic performance of the students whom they teach. Even if
the teachers put their maximum effort to make the subject
understandable it may happen that due to some reason the
students could not give a better performance. In such case the
efforts made by the teacher cannot be neglected. For example, a
student worked very hard for his/her exams but due to some
reasons the student was not able to perform well in the exam.
Here there is no mistake of the student or the teacher. So, this
may be proven as injustice to the teacher who have given their
best effort in teaching.
Secondly, there is a strong possibility the teachers in order to get
a good salary will try to make the student study only the topic
which he/she will be asking in exam. In worst case a teacher may
try to leak the exam paper which is not ethical. This kind of
incident can endanger the key principle of education. Education is
given to the students for the betterment of one’s country and
social changes. Also, in some schools a certain subject is taught by
more than 1 teacher. In such cases it becomes difficult to know
that which teacher gave more or less efforts in making students
learn the subject. This may produce differences among the
teachers and they can try to show each other down for the sake
of good salary.
The third reason for my contrary thoughts with this statement is
that in certain schools there are rules that the intelligent students
will sit in one class and the weak students will sit in other class.
Here the problem is that a certain subject is taught by a same
teacher in both the class. So, by natural the performance of the
class with intelligent students will be undoubtedly better than the
class of weak students. So, in such case how to decide that the
teacher will get increment or decrement in their salary? Also,
teachers may try to pressurize the students in order to get a good
result followed by good salary. This may lead to mental
disturbance for some students.
This statement can be effective in some of the rural government
schools where the punctuality and the teaching pedagogy of
teachers are questioned. But again, there is a strong probability
that the government school teachers may contaminate the results
of their students and show very fine results and grades in order to
get a good salary. In such case the future of the students is
endangered and they are being denied the true education they
deserve.
In the final analysis, I would like to say that this kind of rule have a
higher chance of having more negative effects rather than
affirmative. So, this is a huge statement to be implemented in the
education system. So, there is a very high chance of this policy not
proving effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | bashirheidari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | yswang | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- Governments should focus on solving immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- “Teacher’s salary should be based on theirstudent’s academic performance” 50
- Teacher’s salary should decided on the basis of student’s academic performance. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rmance of the students whom they teach. Even if the teachers put their maximum effort ...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'In the worst'.
Suggestion: In the worst
...c which he/she will be asking in exam. In worst case a teacher may try to leak the exa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Incident
...r which is not ethical. This kind of incident can endanger the key principle of educa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 26, column 33, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o know that which teacher gave more or less efforts in making students learn the s...
^^^^
Line 41, column 36, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ts. This statement can be effective in some of the rural government schools where the pun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, well, for example, kind of, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 28.8173652695 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 2260.96107784 118% => OK
No of words: 544.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61207931395 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413602941176 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.22255489022 237% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3124752808 57.8364921388 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3214285714 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 49.0 5.15768463074 950% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405803495193 0.218282227539 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12346060783 0.0743258471296 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132225558965 0.0701772020484 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935529095196 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111485458372 0.0628817314937 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.