Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
In the world with uncertainties we need to understand that it hardly possible to make an idea into a success without failures. Though it is tempeting to say that only the people who stubbernly continue their ides leave legacy of completing those. It is far from truth. While leaving in this volatile world sometimes it is required to listen to the critisim and respond to them constructively. And obviously we require both the stubbornness towards ideas and listening to critical response for leaving lasting legacy.
There is no better example to this, then steve jobs. One of the founder of apple competers and regarded by many as visionary. He was known for his stubborn and intransigent outlook towards product design even at the cost of functionalities. He codesigned many products like the first iphone, user interface of imac. For his very attention to detail he is highly regarded. Still it is necessary to note that, though he had given many best selling products he has also designed products like cube computer which was designed as a perfect cube. It had many engineering issues resulting in least sells of all time. While it was a great design it was highly critised for its software and hardware problems. And he had to let go of that idea to focus on the new one which is when we got ipods.
Furthermore, to look at another example from non-business world, we can look at the styles of goverment and there relative successes while implementing any policy. To understand this, lets look at the autocratic type of governence, here any type of doubts and critisism is bad, therefore any ideas which supreme leader likes are completed without any analysis; resulting in bad policy harmful to people. Here we make a mistake to look at it as leaving a legacy regardless of it being bad one. One has to understand that this it is not a lasting legacy. On the other hand, in democratic kind of governence, we can clearly see that with every policy which is put forth it is duly critised it is refined many times, which results in a good policy for the people as it takes into account opnions of all the people involved. This is certainly going to be legacy which will affect peoples lives for long time.
So in conclusion, it is obvious that there is no certain way to come through with the ideas, and there is fine line that is need to be followed to make the idea into reality. A little too far going towards not listening to idea will result in completed ideas which might not be worthy of any legacy. While on the other hand, opening up to harsh criticism can result in arriving of doubts about the idea itself and non-completion of the idea in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | keisham | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n idea into a success without failures. Though it is tempeting to say that only the pe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...ention to detail he is highly regarded. Still it is necessary to note that, though he...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the least'.
Suggestion: in the least
...t had many engineering issues resulting in least sells of all time. While it was a great...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, look, so, still, then, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6532769556 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63032873126 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492600422833 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.916895028 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6956521739 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179675141209 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507522791287 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061016348441 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113682294602 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062792577514 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.