Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Some wise man once correctly said, “Knowledge learnt is never a waste “. Learning is like a perennial river, it never stops until the end of time. All humans keep on learning something or the other each and every day though one may never be aware of that. You may never know when that learning will actually help you in your life but trust me, it never goes waste. Going with this flow, I completely agree with what the University proposes to all its students.
Firstly, just sticking to what one’s curriculum says simply reminds me of my school days when during the math class if we were taught the multiplication tables of 2 and 3, we simply memorised that without even asking the teacher why not teach the tables of 13 or 17. Surely studying what your syllabus demands are one thing and one must always abide by that. But at the same time, we must also be aware of the things that are not present in the book. Simply mugging up things and blindly writing down those will fetch you marks but this is not learning if I insist. And in real life too, nobody is going to stop you and ask you the definition of mitochondria or Euler’s theorem.
Secondly, Universities always want the benefit for the students too and prepare them for their life. That is why they require the students to not just restrict oneself to learning what the teacher teaches but also explore more and more. In my experience too, I like to learn a lot of new things and I don’t believe in studying only what my syllabus says. Be it in interviews or other meetings, having knowledge more than that of the book surely actually makes you stand out and create an impression for others. A Mechanical student can study programming or if a civil student can pursue financial learning. It’s just the willingness to learn and the ability to be able to apply them in life is that matters.
I fully support what the University requires in an affirmative tone as learning something new is never a bad habit or be seen as a burden. Each and every other thing you learn may come in handy in your life but you may never know when. Therefore, I strongly agree with the university and surely the students should learn and pursue beyond what the college teaches them.
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 83
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 58
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
Some wise man once correctly said, “Knowledge learnt is never a waste “. Lea...
^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...aid, “Knowledge learnt is never a waste “. Learning is like a perennial river, it...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54567901235 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38474294906 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520987654321 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2530196998 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8947368421 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21044757497 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682130107818 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477453480358 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140760006477 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512347960037 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.