Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field
of study.
University is a place where a student can broaden their perspectives towards their interests, optimize their time to explore talents and decide a path for themselves. Universities should offer and encourage participation courses beyond curriculum and students should also actively participate and explore. Career based education is solemn perhaps it does teach you many essentials of life.
Extra curricular or Co-curricular can be in any field ranging close to area of study or polar opposite. For an instance, a graduate on engineering can take up a course in business management or music, painting, history, economics, etc. This broadens an individuals knowledge and awareness of things around them. Knowledge no matter how or in which field never goes waste. Learning about how to manage a business along with majoring in a particular stream of engineering opens door for newer and better job profiles , better salary or a confidence to startup a new venture all by themselves. Having exemplifying that, learning painting which is very contrasting to the field of engineering may still enhance a person’s life. It is not necessary that every course taken up for trial or passion should get converted into a pay cheque.
Many Researches have also stated that pursuing something beyond career fields, helps in mental, emotional ,spiritual and physical well being of a person. It gives one an opportunity to take break from their field to refresh their mind. It not only helps them in keeping their mental health on check, but helps in better performance in their careers.
In order to conclude my stance on the issue I firmly agree with the authors take that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses. It may not necessarily reap the benefits as soon as taken up but surely someday in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r themselves. Universities should offer and encourage participation courses beyo...
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...story, economics, etc. This broadens an individuals knowledge and awareness of things aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s door for newer and better job profiles , better salary or a confidence to start...
^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d better job profiles , better salary or a confidence to startup a new venture al...
^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to paint'.
Suggestion: to paint
...ves. Having exemplifying that, learning painting which is very contrasting to the field ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...areer fields, helps in mental, emotional ,spiritual and physical well being of a p...
^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as taken up but surely someday in life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15436241611 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84878773309 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0005962016 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275522344475 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768060397193 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105375295225 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162201041828 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982895260003 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.