The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations
The given bar chart illustrates the information in terms of how much money five groups investing in machinery, building, staff training and research.
As can be inferred from the chart, there are different trends among five organizations. While groups B, D and E share the rather similar pattern with the highest money spending on building, the opposite is true for organization A and C. Another key feature is that B is the organization which invests most money in both categories.
It is clear that building and research is two of the most dominant sections in organization B with around 1.6 billion Euros, followed by staff training and the lowest money investing is in machinery at 1.3 billion Euros. The value of the investing in group B is nearly double than that of group D and E. Notwithstanding the same pattern, research is the least attractive categories that organization D and E spend money on, just 0.3 billion Euros.
In terms of group A and C, the value of machinery and research are not different. While group A focuses most on staff training, this section attaches the lowest money in organization C.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-24 | lee giang | 67 | view |
2023-09-24 | dorae | 73 | view |
2023-08-17 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
2023-08-13 | ca | 73 | view |
2021-01-12 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- If a product is good or meets people s needs they will buy it Therefore advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment To what extent do you agree or disagree Agree or Disagree 78
- The table below gives information about salaries of secondary high school teachers in five countries in 2009 90
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88481675393 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91348908165 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5787919877 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191702476809 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841212174975 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629000614889 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128837943134 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683403318955 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.