The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The depicted bar chart represents the proportion of regular physical activities of males and females among six age groups in Australia in 2010. Overall, women were more dominant in physical exercise than men.
The chart displays that there was evidence of a steady boost in the percentage of females who regularly worked out. Here, 52.8% of men from 15 to 24 exercised daily which was nearly 5% higher than women from that age group. However, the scenario remained quite opposite in all other age groups.
Physical activity was more trendy among women in the 25 to 34 age group (48.9%) while males did around 6% less activity than their female counterparts. This dominance of women was more prevalent in age groups like 35 to 44, where 13% more women did workouts, in 45 to 44, where women overshadowed men by 10% approximately, and in 55 to 64, where the difference was about 8%. In the age group 65 and over, this difference was much less, where only 0.4% more females did the activity than males.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 92
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'exercised' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'exercises'.
Suggestion: exercises
...d out. Here, 52.8% of men from 15 to 24 exercised daily which was nearly 5% higher than w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48577339831 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7840784883 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385190152548 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169072997104 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744284455388 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268945744969 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627730286291 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.