Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Research is getting more and more popular in a lot of fields like academic environments and trading issues. Although it may have some negative impacts to share all the information freely on the Internet and in other environments, I believe that its benefits far outweigh its drawbacks.
To mention its disadvantages, firstly, I can point out that many people don't use the information morally. For example, in a university's thesis, one can steal the idea and the methods of doing a particular project and get good results without any effort. This phenomenon certainly has adverse effects on the quality of education. Using others' actions in an unethical way can discourage creative and innovative students.
In another way, for example, take a business plan which is shared freely on the Internet. This event can prevent the development of that business because it decreases its originality without receiving any copyright money. But I think it has many benefits too. Consider a scientific paper that has been published in a high-quality journal. Nowadays, there have been considered some environments and websites that all academic people from students to teachers share all their works documents ranging from programming codes, Word files, and all other kinds of reports. This occurrence turns into a rich source for other researchers to use and take some valuable ideas from it. In this way, a lot of time is saved for the researchers, resulting in excellent works. The academic society benefits a lot from this collaboration. It is an indisputable fact that all this human progress couldn't have happened without using our ancestors' knowledge and experiences. Imagine that the BMW corporation starts inventing the cars' wheels from the beginning. Using others' knowledge can decrease the required time by half.
By way of conclusion, I contend that the free flow of information is definitely helpful for all society.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 92
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
- The money spent by governments on space programs would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rstly, I can point out that many people dont use the information morally. For exampl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he information morally. For example, in a universitys thesis, one can steal the i...
^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unethical way" with adverb for "unethical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lity of education. Using others actions in an unethical way can discourage creative and innovative ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 878, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...table fact that all this human progress couldnt have happened without using our ancesto...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23376623377 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92762100511 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574675324675 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7556345578 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193640519925 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530896605276 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537821118612 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111581187274 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611220480192 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.