Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Our today's world can be called the world of information, so the way this flow of information distributes is controversial. A portion of society believes in spreading knowledge and information freely among the academic and business world, and others disagree with that. Both beliefs have their own merits and demerits, though I personally believe that free distributing information can make our world more liable and professional.
From the former point of view, the world today has no locked door to anyone. Precisely, with the advent of the Internet and such technologies, there is no limit to find information for everyone, if they seek that enough though! So limitation in sharing knowledge can be considered impossible from this aspect. There are indisputable advantages for the existing free flow of information in society. First of all, every person, regardless of his level of living, can find his way to progress. Equally importantly, though, people can rely more on governments that share scientific and social data without any hesitation. Several dark sides can be mentioned for this belief, though. Some scientific findings can cause fear, conflict, and anxiety in society if there is not sufficient awareness background. For instance, developing new military equipment by governments is an example of information that sharing may cause security difficulties for all members of society.
Limitation in sharing some sort of information by government or academics has its own positive and negative points. If there are laws that support this limitation, it is possible that some people use them to earn money or other advantages from information which they have to share with everyone as a responsibility. Besides, ordinary people may have to charge or spend lots of time to find data that they already have the right to access. This trend has terrible impacts on the theory of the global village. Although in some medical and security cases, delay in sharing information with society can have less dangerous and support existing calm and reducing stress.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that our world today do not tolerate hesitation in sharing knowledge, and such action can cause anxiety and bad feeling in people to their governments.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 92
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 84
- The money spent by governments on space programs would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...f living, can find his way to progress. Equally importantly, though, people can rely mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, for instance, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25549450549 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91463060255 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1273541194 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276832322084 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902975844467 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653009121767 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163864158736 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643643647089 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...f living, can find his way to progress. Equally importantly, though, people can rely mo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, for instance, sort of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25549450549 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91463060255 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1273541194 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276832322084 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902975844467 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653009121767 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163864158736 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643643647089 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.