The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart gives some information about the number of production and consumption of electricity in ten distinct countries in 2014.
In general, the rate of production in all countries is higher than consumption except in Germany in 2014. The china and United States have significantly higher production and consumption rather than others and Germany and Korea Rep. located in the lowest place.
As can be seen, two China and the United States countries are located in first and second place by ordered 5398 and 4099 billion kWh production and 5322, 3866 billion kWh consumption. From Russia where both production and consumption sharply dropped and was in third place to France the production rate reduced slightly to about 5000 billion kWh. France and Brazil produce approximately equal electricity and the last country has the lowest production rate at 485.1 billion kWh. The people use electricity at a similar production rate and in all countries consumption was less than production except Germany.
As a result, the last seventh countries have under 1000 billion kWh electricity produce and used.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-09 Helen L 67 view
2024-06-09 Helen L 67 view
2024-03-17 MinyiChu 67 view
2023-12-31 Ahmad_off 73 view
2023-12-31 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...at a similar production rate and in all countries consumption was less than production ex...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, in general, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26553672316 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78971357586 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 117.379551812 43.030603864 273% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228053138939 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119003454504 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108757950588 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169902943045 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10857131143 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.