The bar chart shows the percentage of males and females aged 18-20 in a city who participated in various activities in one month in 2015.
The chart below compares the proportion of each city's gender between the ages of 18 and 20 who had spent time on leisure activities for one month in 2015.
Overall, it is obvious that the percentage of men mainly took part in football, basketball, and hockey, while cycling and swimming were common among women. In addition, the figure for men who played football was the highest throughout the period.
50% of the males in the survey were often more into playing football, compared to only 16% of the females asked. Similarly, the proportion of men participated in basketball far exceeded that of their counterparts, with respective figures being around 35% and over 10% in 2015. At the same time, the rate of males playing hockey was over 10%, which was significantly higher than that of females, at only 0.5%.
In contrast, the choice of women in swimming was about 35%, and the figure for men was lower, at exactly 20%. As for cycling, approximately 40% of females enjoyed this activity, while north of 35% of males did so.
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 67
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the traveling public in the US in 2009 89
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83707865169 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57975301443 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.7848671705 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216300588106 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864968742649 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106127287405 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140295982699 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129639810186 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.