The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate the data about the working hours of Scandinavian citizens from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. The data are divided into 6 groups: 1-14, 15-20, 21-30, 31-34, 35-40, and 41+ hours.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of workers who work from 35 to 40 hours per week took up the highest value in all of 6 different countries.
In detail, the number of workers who worked 1-14 hours each week was the least percentage in the four countries, fluctuating between 2,9% and 4,6%, whereas the figure for those who spent 15-20 hours/week to work was slightly higher and Denmark was the nation which took up the largest percentage in this hours group, at 7,2%.
Sweden, Finland, and Norway had the lowest proportion of individuals working 31-34 hours, with 11,6%, 10,5%, and 11,5% respectively. However, in terms of the 35-40 worked hours group, there were over 45% of employees in four Scandinavian countries work from 35 to 40 hours each week. In addition, Sweden was the nation which had the highest percentage of workers who choose to work over 41 hours every week, while the figure for Denmark was only 9,6%.
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Some believe that success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think that it depends on factors such as money or personal appearance Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- Nowadays companies are trying to increase the sales of their products in various ways What are the different methods that they use Which one is the most effective 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88205128205 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44327627338 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9259458585 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180143091432 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944871387225 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661061293975 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11724052718 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280363052229 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.