Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is argued that the government should not fund for supporting art and culture, while other people advocate for this view. Whereas subsidies are advised to use for assisting art and culture are not essential because of using that money in order to tackle urgent problems such as the unemployment, funding by governemnt for cultural activities may boost the economic nation. I fully concur with the second view.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that subsidies should be used for handling serious issues such as jobless. In reality, it is undoubted that redundancy can trigger a lot of detrimental effects, namely on the unemployed. They have difficulties in making purchase food, or other commodities because of the lack of money. For this reason, the subsidies are extremely imperative. For instance, during the terrible period of infecious desease such as covid-19, many people encounter difficulties, particularly finance. As a result, funding for supporting art and culture is not of necessary.
Despite obvious arguments above, from my opinion, I think that subsidies by government for cultural activities can foster the growth of economic nation. Given the fact that extraordinary culture may appeal to visitors, particularly oversea travellers. Fortunately, this results in a positive impact on tackling the unemployment. It is evident that this can create occupation opportunities and as a consequence, the unemployed will seize these opportunities in order to escape obstacles in their life. A good example of this is Vietnam, this country paved a new way as well as invest a lot of money in cultural activities aimed the enhancement of visitors in the world. And until now, the policy is still effective, and bring a lot of benefits.
In conclusion, based on the mentioned arguments above, from my perspective, I advocate for the second view. Subsidies by government for culture can boost the economic nation, addressing the scarcity of emplyment in the modern society
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- when designing a building the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationship Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, so, still, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30599369085 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03398864928 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4247881997 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381824899251 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112319722229 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114100983219 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235990490634 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999081453161 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, so, still, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30599369085 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03398864928 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4247881997 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381824899251 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112319722229 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114100983219 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235990490634 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999081453161 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.