Birth rates in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000
The line graph illustrates changes in the levels of Birth rates in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, over the period as a whole, the levels of birth rates fall fell in all two countries. Overall, the birth rate of the USA is higher than China’s birth rate especially after 1950 but the birth rate of both countries followed a similar trend.
In 1920, the number of birth rates in the USA was at 11. After that, 1920 to 1940 saw a fluctuation to 12 in the birth rates. Next, the number of birth rates plunged to a low of 4 in 1945. After that, the figure of China increased dramatically to 15 in 1950. Next, it steadily falls for the following year, but then increased gradually to 8 and the end at 7. Beginning the period at just 10 in China. However, it rose dramatically to 15 in 1935, after that it dropped dramatically to 5. It remained stable for the following years, but then there was a sudden increase with the rate reaching a peak of 20 in 1950 and then China saw a more moderate falls fall at 4 over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | phadode | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 67
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 56
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the number of birth rates in the USA was at 11. After that, 1920 to 1940 saw a fl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29126213592 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48956725977 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.260494879 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3636363636 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45988517918 0.215688989381 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18570471789 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189733946261 0.0843802449381 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.392637244198 0.15604864568 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158209114254 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.