The graph and chart below give information about the number of new graduates and their employment in the UK from 1992 to 2002.
The given charts provide information about new graduate and their job in 4 different types of employment in the UK between 1992 and 2002. Overall, it can be obviously seen that, from 1992 to 1997, the number of new graduates increased significantly but felt down suddenly in 2002. Professional was the highest chosen job compared to others job. Conversely, employee for sales was the lowest.
In 1992, the quantity of new graduate stood at 165.000. By 5 years period, new graduate number inclined to 195.000 in 1997 dramatically. It was in 2002 that the number of new graduates declined to 180.000.
The figure for professional in 1992, 1997 and 2002 was 59%, 45% and 40% respectively, and it was the highest employment which was chosen by new graduates. Secondly, the figure for management & administrative in 1992 was 20%, and it was similar in 1997 and 2002, around 17%. In the sequel, it was Followed by clerical & secretarical and other employment. It can be seen that sales had small number of new graduates from 1992 to 2002, around 5% to 10%, leading to the lowest employment chosen by new graduate.
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment to address it at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 67
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to job'
Suggestion: to job
...02. Professional was the highest chosen job compared to others job. Conversely, emp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, second, secondly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86243386243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86120744534 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513227513228 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7203031124 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5454545455 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372133594338 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155708750767 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139733503871 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274127128956 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712798674348 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.