The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they give birth to their first child in 1966, 1986 and 2006.

The given chart compares the percentage of women who give birth to their first child in Australia in terms of age in three years, 1966, 1986 and 2006.
It is clear that the figures of group aged 30- to 34-year-old and over 35 was witnessed a considerable increase during this period, while the opposite was true for groups aged 20- to 24-year-old and under 19. In addition, the percentage of people over 40 is the lowest.
As can be seen from the chart that in spite of occupying a highest proportion at 60% in 1966, the cohort between the age of 20 and 24 significantly decreased to a half in 2006. The percentage of group aged under 19 experienced the same pattern, with a drop by 15%.
Looking at the chart in more detail, notwithstanding the fact that the number of people aged over 30 was witnessed a soar in 2006, the percentage of women who give birth to their first child aged over 40 was lowest at 5%. On the other side, the proportion of group aged 25- to 29-year-old rose to 50% in 1986, followed by a decrease of 10% in 2006.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-15 TLan168 67 view
2022-03-08 annalabie 56 view
2021-11-04 Nguyễn Ngọc Diệp view
2020-12-22 viviannguyen 73 view
2020-09-26 The Lazy Tiger 56 view
Essays by user viviannguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...om the chart that in spite of occupying a highest proportion at 60% in 1966, the ...
^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decreased' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decreases'.
Suggestion: decreases
...ween the age of 20 and 24 significantly decreased to a half in 2006. The percentage of gr...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, while, in addition, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37628865979 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5997835452 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6222683347 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305075349107 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149924191468 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16799403819 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231881653261 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183889260877 0.0819641961636 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.