The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside. What extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether encouraging urban living is the most effective solution to address pressing traffic and transportation issues has elicited a spectrum of opinions worldwide. While proponents assert its merits as a panacea, I maintain a nuanced stance, partially dissenting from this viewpoint.
From one vantage point, it is undeniable that the concentration of urban dwellers could yield a measure of respite to burgeoning traffic woes. As urbanization burgeons, there is a concomitant diminution in commutes undertaken by indigenous denizens. Proximity between abodes and workplaces could spawn a preference for pedestrian locomotion and utilization of public transit systems, thus attenuating vehicular congestion. This shift, beyond merely ameliorating gridlocks, may also abet in the reduction of parking space burdens and mitigate the discordant clamor of noise pollution.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it remains implausible that the sole prescription of encouraging city habitation could comprehensively redress this predicament. Primarily, the spatial capacity of urban centers often proves insufficient to accommodate the entirety of inhabitants, particularly those with modest financial means. This exacerbates the lamentable phenomenon of homelessness, overshadowing the presumed gains of urban migration. Moreover, the efficacy of this approach is constrained by the absence of stringent governmental edicts curtailing personal vehicular usage. The dearth of regulations governing individual traffic engenders a quagmire in exerting control over urban transportation volume, impeding efficacious mitigation of the transportation quandary.
To conclude, while the aggregation of populace within city confines proffers manifold advantages in mitigating traffic and transportation quandaries, I steadfastly assert that this approach harbors discernible drawbacks that cannot be gainsaid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | viviannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | viviannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | viviannguyen | 56 | view |
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measure outweigh the drawbacks 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- The table below gives information about values of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 73
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether encouraging urban living is the most ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.43968871595 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45065333424 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684824902724 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8857093677 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.916666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943116669051 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312560318698 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417513197713 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605604156513 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278978560526 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.07 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.42 8.58950901804 145% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether encouraging urban living is the most ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.43968871595 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45065333424 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684824902724 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8857093677 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.916666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943116669051 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312560318698 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417513197713 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605604156513 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278978560526 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.07 12.4159519038 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 12.42 8.58950901804 145% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.