The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates how families in a nation spent their weekly salary during the period of 50 year since 1968.
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of weekly income spending on food, fuel, clothing and footwear as well as personal good decreased while the data on housing, transport and leisure witnessed a reverse trend between 1968 and 2018. In addition, the figure for household goods remained unchanged over 50 years beginning from 1968.
To begin with, the proportion of weekly income spending on food dropped dramatically from exactly 35% to around 17% whilst the rate on housing went up significantly by about 9% from 1968 to 2018. Moreover, the ratio of amount which families spent on leisure every week rose up quickly from about 9% to approximate 22%, which was the highest figure of the category in 2018.
One the other hand, family spent least money every week on fuel and power with 6% and 4% in 1968 and 2018 respectively. Concerning the data on clothing went down dramatically by 5% when the figure for transport increased from about 8% to 14%. Additionally, amount of money was spent on personal goods dropped by nearly 6%. Finally, the rate of household goods remained stable after 50 year, at around 8%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In come cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...in 2018. One the other hand, family spent least money every week on fuel and power with...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87264150943 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54679854038 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7315587097 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200448581243 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887144799439 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693977257107 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142059453205 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454296335426 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.