The chart below gives information about Istanbul Promo plus sales in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The chart illustrates the sales of “Istanbul Promo plus” during the year of 2007.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that the amount of sales of “Istanbul Promo plus” in March was the highest point. In the meantime, those in July and September recorded by far the lowest figure.
Before reaching the peak at 350 millions of turkish lira in March, the sales of this product started at approximately 200 in the first month of 2012. However, in contrast to the previous months, during the period of 4 months, the sales fell from the highest point and decelerated dramatically, a drop at under 150 in July.
Followed by a growth pattern that was more varied, the sales in September remained stable at the same number of the figure of July. However, the opposite trend could be seen when you look at the figures of the rest of the months in 2012, a jump to nearly 200 in December.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-30 tr_h.20 73 view
2024-04-30 tr_h.20 73 view
2024-01-16 honguyenlily 67 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 73 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 61 view
Essays by user nhunnnnn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '350 million'.
Suggestion: 350 million
...t figure. Before reaching the peak at 350 millions of turkish lira in March, the sales of thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2012, a jump to nearly 200 in December.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, in contrast, in general, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59627329193 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47960703799 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0568931518 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120094443315 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693687011565 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958361603649 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108064727553 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105665206006 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.