The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how much people in Britain spent on donating to charity among ages in 1990 and 2010. Overall, the most significant feature on this diagram is the highest percent belong to 36-50 aged group throughout these years.
Taking a look at the diagram in more details, just over 15% of 18-to-25-year-old young British people gave money to non-profit organizations in 1990 but this percentage experienced a sharp decrease by nearly 10% in the next 20 years. Likewise, the proportion of people in Britain ranged from 26 to 35 dropped minimally with 30% and 24% in 1990 and 2010 respectively.
Turning to the other age groups, it can be seen from the chart that the percentage of over 36-year-old people accounted for more than one third. To explain this, middle-aged group peaked at 0.4 in 1990 that was the highest percent among years and age groups. Additionally, people aged from 51 to over 65 made up one third in both 1990 and 2010 with the peak at just under 40% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- www testbig com 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 61
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 20
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 10
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The bar chart illustrates how much people in Britain spent on donating to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72988505747 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73005444121 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1876698642 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313048776917 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143910331749 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574348329676 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20372535459 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253236914155 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.