The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart illustrates the proportion of people donating to charity programs in British divided into five groups of age within 1990 and 201Overview, young adult spent the least money on charity in both of the years whereas the most contribution was made by people in the age of 36-50 in 1990 compared to the group of 51-65 years old in 2010.
In the age range of 36-50, the percentage of contribution made by people was over 40% in 1990 and fell by over 5% to 35% in 2010. Similarly, the middle-aged people spent more money on the charity in 1990 compared to 2010 (about 31% and 24% respectively). In the British, there was a significant difference in the rate of young adult giving money to charity between two years. The figure for the year 1990 was over double that of 2010, which was around 7%.
On the other hand, people over 50 donated their money in 2010 more than the remaining year. The percentage of people over 65 spending money on donation was exactly 35% in 2010 meanwhile 32% of British people who gave money to charity in 1990. About 40% of people in the age of 51-65 dedicated to society in 2010 which was higher than 1990 about 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 61
- www testbig com 11
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 20
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 10
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47619047619 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39436223691 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461904761905 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6691702029 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443234497291 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205982240565 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580758494467 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324052922884 0.15604864568 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409093325156 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.