The chart below provides the information on the percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below provides the information on the percentage of national consumer expenditure by category 2002.

The stipulated tabular chart explicated the information about the proportion of national consumer spent on distinct categories in year 2002. The data is calibrated in percentage form.

In general, it is readily apparent from table presentation that Turkey expend the utmost position on various items; whereas Sweden divulged the lowest trend.

Initially, it is clearly visible that in Ireland, the most of individuals spent money on food and drinks amounted to 28.91%; however paying on clothes, leisure and education was lies between 2% and 6%. Further, in Italy, people spent more on drinks and tobacco rather than other footwear and education to nearby 3.20% and 16.36%.

Probing further, in Spain and Sweden, masses expend most on food drinks and tobacco to roughly 19%; whilst others depicts the least proportion on clothes, spare and education which had only 1% to 6%. Additionally, in Turkey, 32.14% of inhabitants expend on food and tobacco, then clothes and leisure noticed percentile between 4% and 6%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-05 ramnu kaur 84 view
2022-05-14 alexandra2101 view
2021-12-26 bhavybha view
2021-09-24 Nimasha 81 view
2021-09-24 Nimasha 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the individuals') or simply say ''most individuals''.
Suggestion: most of the individuals; most individuals
...is clearly visible that in Ireland, the most of individuals spent money on food and drinks amounted...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 3.20% and 16.36%. Probing further, in Spain and Sweden, masses expend most ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, whereas, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62805593226 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633540372671 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8909013831 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109674613877 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617612801199 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119382933509 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908130774276 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157292864096 0.0819641961636 192% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.