The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The line graph illustrates how many units of five mobile brands were sold during the three periods.
Overall, the number of Samsung and Nokia devices sold were the two highest among other brands throughout the year. However, the figures for all gadget brands were fluctuated.
It was a gradual increase in the figure for Samsung devices, where stood at around 230 millions in the initial year, before it began to rise by 100 millions each years. However, such figure reached a peak in 2013 with virtually 450 millions. Moreover, the number of Nokia phones sales declined slightly, before it began to fell remarkably from above 400 millions to around 250 millions.
The number of Apple phones sold showed a steady increase, about 50 millions each years. How about the figure for ZTE? It increased slightly, but the number of ZTE gadgets purchased just under 100 millions. From this chart, the figure for Appe in 2009 was the lowest with around 10 millions units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Fayna Faradiena | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Komalpreet Singh | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Mohamed talaat | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Qanh03 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-04 | Sukeerty | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 84
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The money spent of the UK, measured in pounds 78
- The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years ending 1994 and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01226993865 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26575638595 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601226993865 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0011841921 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131580703244 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503942643189 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404059291794 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814928423338 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284421639973 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.