The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart demonstrates the main reasons leading to global land degradation while the table displays how three regions were affected by these causes during the 1990s. Overall, it can be seen clearly that over-grazing, forest destruction and over-cultivation are the main factors of reducing land productivity in the world. Besides, Europe was the region which had the highest percentage of degraded land. Regarding the pie chart, 35% of the world’s degraded land was responsible for the degradation of 30% of land in the world. Over-cultivation closed behind at 28% while other factors accounted for 7% of the damage.
Of the three regions, Europe had the greatest proportion of degraded land in the 1990s, which captured 23% in total and turned into the top spot. The primary factor was deforestation, at 9.8%. Compared to the figure of Oceania, which was the second affected region consisting of 13% in total land degradation, this was mostly caused by over-gazing, at 11.3%. North America had the lowest figure of land degradation, only a total of 5% of the land in this region was damaged and mainly because of over-cultivation, responsible for 3.3%.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 84
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 78
- some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding, second, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15343915344 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06860973785 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2583396655 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264442177165 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116159688245 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125365223461 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215324164154 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932910507767 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.