The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different ages in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the ratio of UK citizens of different age periods who get exposed to the Internet on a daily basis between 2003 and 2006.
In general, it is apparent that the Internet gained the most popularity among the youth who get constant access to social media every day. Furthermore, the number of people who enjoyed the Internet has an upward trend over the studied period.
Looking at an early age group, the 16-24 years old participants were the most active users who spent nearly 80 percent of their time on the Internet, before peaking at 100 percent in 2005. After that, this figure saw generally slow down to 90 percent in the last examined year. Placing the second and the third highest proportion of utilizing the Internet were inhabitants aged 25-44 and 45-54 with relatively similar rates, increasing steadily from approximately 50% and 60%, in turn, to 80% by the end of 2006.
Turning to the age group 55-64, making up around a third in 2003, then there was a slight rise throughout 2 years before climbing to nearly a half in 2006. In contrast, the least engaged Internet users were the 65+ age group with a moderate increase from 18% to 20% between 2003 and 2006. Notably, in 2003, people aged 65 and above did not use the Internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- Topic Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, second, so, then, third, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72972972973 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4136747556 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630630630631 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9415796749 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226726932532 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098859017964 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678619278901 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149515476377 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717264219407 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.