The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart given compares a specific nation in terms of the proportion of the day working that adults spared for partaking in distinct activities.
It is clear from the chart that during the research period, adults were prone to spend most of their time working. Additionally, all the figures experienced noticeable changes.
In 1958, the share of time used for working by adults accounted for 33% of the total, while the rate of sleeping was dwarfed by that of working, at 32%. Likewise, the figures for going out and relaxing at home were nearly 1,5 and 4 times as low as that of working, at 19% and 8% respectively. By contrast, adults tended to spare 6% and 2% of their time for other and travelling to work in that order.
In 2008, there was a steady increase in the percentage of working to 42%, while the proportion of relaxing at home was matched by a roughly similar trend to 13%. Meanwhile, the shares of sleeping and going out underwent sunbtantial drops to 25% and 6% in turn, compared to a stability witnessed in that of other, at 6%. At the same time, local residents were more likely to spend time travelling to work, at 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | brew | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 73
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 73
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- Nowadays more people move away from their friends and families for work Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57281553398 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59317825753 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5132451643 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981567391503 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448988717892 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380840435955 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688049835911 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258391351127 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.