The chart below shows that the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
A glance at the bar graph provided reveals the spent time via phone calls measured by minutes, classified into three forms including local, national and international, and mobiles, in Britain between 1995 and 2002. Overall, local form indicates a constant trend although it has experienced some fluctuations. Both national and international and mobiles types display upward trends. In spite of that local form had a steady trend, it was still higher than two columns else. It reached the maximum number of the graph, as well. While mobiles show a steady increase and experienced a jump in the second half of the period, it was the minimum of time in the graph.
To put into perspective, the local type stood at 70 minutes in 1995 and kept the growth, hit the highest point at 90 minutes in 1999. Then, it began to decline gradually, lower than 75 minutes in 2002. The national and international types started from 30 minutes by approximate in 1995 and had a gentle increase in constant, reached a peak higher than 60 in 2002. Mobiles kinds were the minimum of the graph around 3 minutes in 1995 and reached a peak of about 45 minutes in 2002.
There is no doubt that in the first half of the period, there is a widening gulf between the three forms of telephone calls. To elaborate, there was a difference about 75 minutes between local and international, between international and mobiles were almost 35 minutes, and between local and mobiles was around 70 in 1995. The discrepancy between local and international maximized about 50 minutes, then it comes to least after 2000, 10 minutes in 2002 finally. Also, the distinction between international and mobiles decreased, 25 minutes in 2002 eventually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Nguyễn Thành Vinh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
- the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 67
- The chart below shows that the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, still, then, well, while, no doubt, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88275862069 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76618789701 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489655172414 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5579917495 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18971196995 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692734760665 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481225969964 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131342457137 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494651242257 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.