The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 - 2002.
The bar graph provides information about the phone calls made in the uk in 7 years, including local calls, national and international calls, and mobile calls. Units are measured in billions of minutes.
The general trend shown in the chart illustrates a rapid increase in the number of calls made by mobile phone over the given period. Similarly, national and international phone calls on a fixed-line rose steadily from 1995 to 2002. A slight increase, followed by a rapid decrease, is visible in the rate of local, fixed-line, calls, that remained, however, the most used method of phone communication.
In 1995, more than 70 billions of minutes of local calls were made in the UK on fixed lines. This proportion grew marginally to reach a peak of 90 billion 4 years later, but after that, it decreased steadily to the same amount of 7 years before. Conversely, phone calls made nationally and internationally on a fixed-line increased their rate gradually. The figure was just below 40 billion in 1995, but it reached 60 billion in 2001 and proceeded to remain steady.
The category which went up significantly over the years is the mobile phone calls, with its only 2 billions of minutes of calls made in 1995. A first peak was reached in 1999 with just over 10 billion, but the rate increased by three times in the following 3 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 billion'.
Suggestion: 70 billion
...hone communication. In 1995, more than 70 billions of minutes of local calls were made in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 billion'.
Suggestion: 2 billion
...s the mobile phone calls, with its only 2 billions of minutes of calls made in 1995. A first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77369952303 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554112554113 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4604216625 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.181818182 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215665414035 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090624399273 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607996257812 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129077825462 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374710019003 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.