The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart and the table illustrate the changes in export earnings from five different categories in one nation between 2015 and 2016.
Overall, it is clear that the value of exports increased in all product categories except Gems and jewellery during 2015 and 2016. In addition, Textiles showed a biggest change.
Looking at the chart and the table in more detail, Petroleum products and Engineered goods accounted for a biggest number of export earnings. Those categories saw an upward trend at 3% and 8,5% respectively over the period shown. In contrast, there was a decrease in Gems and jewellery, over 5% from 43 billions in 2015 to 40 billions in 2016.
Turning to two remaining categories, it is evident that in 2016 export earnings from Agricultural products experienced a slight increase just under 1%, while Textiles increased dramatically from 25 billions to over 30 billions (a 15,24% rise) compared to 2015.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 hackerman0147 67 view
2020-01-16 dantesw 73 view
2020-01-07 tbinh 73 view
2019-12-30 Molor-Od 84 view
2019-12-30 Noranmao 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... and 2016. In addition, Textiles showed a biggest change. Looking at the chart a...
^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ucts and Engineered goods accounted for a biggest number of export earnings. Thos...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, well, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11258278146 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77221738796 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.601070914 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316126838184 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147263128544 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104160873614 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218661115125 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982118699365 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.