The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,

and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by jreemy on Sat, 10/26/2019 - 04:56

Given are three pie charts comparing average portions of three different ingredients in typical meals in the United States. These three nutrients are sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar, which may harmful to people's health if intaken excessively.

People consume nearly half of daily sodium intake during dinner and roughly a third that of in lunch. The remaining sodium consumption is distributed evenly in breakfast and snacks, 14 percent, to be exact. saturated fat, shows a similar pattern with sodium, is consumed mostly during dinner and lunch, 37 percent and 26 percent, respectively. However, saturated fat contained in snacks is 5 percent higher than that in breakfast.

Added sugar, on the other hand, is intook much more in the snacks than other meals. compared to about a quarter in dinner, 42 percent added sugar is consumed in snack eating. The remaining two meals, account for less than one fifth that of daily added sugar.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 yasamin27 73 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 67 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 56 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 61 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 61 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user jreemy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are three pie charts comparing average port...
^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Saturated
...st and snacks, 14 percent, to be exact. saturated fat, shows a similar pattern with sodiu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Compared
...ch more in the snacks than other meals. compared to about a quarter in dinner, 42 percen...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, third, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51532660648 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655844155844 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9567408774 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836638432197 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363028009453 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529762448977 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686546470606 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072885283746 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.