The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar graph displays the average number of years that were spent at school for both adult males and adult females, while the pie chart illustrates the different educational qualification of adults in Singapore from 2000 till 2010.
Overall, what stands for the bar graph that the adult males were the highest proportion when compared with the adult females that have remained more or less the same. On the other hand in the pie chart, the high school and the university qualifications were considered the highest percentage in 2000; on contrast with the primary that have experienced a remarkable decline in 2010.
The bar graph represents average levels of participation at school from 2000 to 2010 for both adult males and females. Moreover, the adult males increased steadily to slightly over one to ten in 2010 but the adult females maintained at a small amount.
The pie chart constitutes the five level of educational qualification. In 2000, the high school made up the biggest proportion at just over a third followed by secondary school and primary qualification but the master qualification was of a small amount. On the other hand in 2010, the university qualification comprised to over a third followed by the master qualification but the primary qualification constituted to a significant amount.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 67
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind this What are the effects on individuals and people around them 61
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 73
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ults in Singapore from 2000 till 2010. Overall, what stands for the bar graph t...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erienced a remarkable decline in 2010. The bar graph represents average levels ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... females maintained at a small amount. The pie chart constitutes the five level...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, third, while, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17757009346 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99009924758 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467289719626 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8598034493 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315276969207 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15649622172 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117749961105 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201760946484 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807377711005 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.