Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish. Others, however, argue that it has only made people busier.
Technology has taken a share in corporations techniques and systems by providing accuracy and solving equations better than human minds. Moreover, it has saved lots of waste in budget for employers. However, the most of cultured minds totally think the vise versa but, How ?
This essay will Discuss those various points of view as following;
Back to 19th century labor force was relying on their hands and physical strength to get their food instead of nowadays they are only depending on some machines. So as to increase the industry factor scientists and ministers of industries, have set a full funded plan to upgrade the production techniques from labor force to one click machines. Although, this lighted path they have been through was blessed but, it has brought double edged consequences.Nevertheless, Regarding the positive results were for employers. Such as decreasing the numbers of labors by replacing them with machines and decreasing wages by informing the rested ones that they whether acclimatize to the new conditions or being fired. As mentioned above explains why it is a positive outcome for employers in all ways they spends less and they gain more than before. Getting back to the negative results according to the labor whenever they report their condemnation then it has no good response. So, If the labor law provides articles and though regulations to save the labors the the government should make sure that those codes are applied the right way they were set to.
A wave of cultured thoughts have risen since the invasion of technology when it had passed the limits of work and has a full domination of our society and liberty. In addition, has been chained to technology. This production as long as it has helped and still helping nations to develop and to get to the developed ones than them but, it also can be considered a high risky weapon that great countries can use to exploit or change situations that they want.
So, the feedback as given above was all discussing and illustrating why technology is good path for employers and the vise verse for employees. Even though there are opposing team are against who would pay and support any actions to stop the spreading of technology from stealing their jobs, time and freedom of thinking. In a nutshell, technology has been identified as a double edged weapon each nation has the total right to use it for its good.
In my opinion, the technological ways of work has helped us a lot by making it easier and it has provided the jobs that cope with the present development.
- Your car insurance company has told you that they are going to increase the amount you have to pay in insurance for your car each month You are not happy about this Write a letter to your insurance company In your letter explain Why you are writing to the 56
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region Others believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opi 73
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views an 89
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 89
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...get their food instead of nowadays they are only depending on some machines. So as to increase the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: To
...ey are only depending on some machines. So as to increase the industry factor scientists...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...t has brought double edged consequences.Nevertheless, Regarding the positive results were fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... outcome for employers in all ways they spends less and they gain more than before. Ge...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1054, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...d though regulations to save the labors the the government should make sure that those ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1054, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...d though regulations to save the labors the the government should make sure that those ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, as to, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7814851019 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.6014590559 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.294117647 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5882352941 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745153701369 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245470096467 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293833470442 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0449823344448 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357618765772 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.