The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The charts illustrate information about the rate of Singaporean citizens participating in education and participants' qualifications between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, both male and female survey respondents showed an upward trend in participating in education over the whole survey period. Moreover, a university degree was considered the highest level. In contrast, the lowest rate was found at the level of Primary School.
Women held 8% at the beginning and then remained relatively constant. While the male population was about 8.5%, it climbed slightly to around 9.8% until 2004. At the end of the period, the female had the same level of the male in 2000. By contrast, the male continued to grow by 2%.
With regard of level of adults, master level and university level accounted for the lowest point in 2000. This figure saw growth of 7.5% and 8.3%, while the figure saw a huge increase of 30.31% and 32,93% in 2010. On the contrary, secondary school and high school enrollment halved from 26.3% to 15.2% and from 32.13% to 15.2%, respectively. The primary school followed, decreasing sharply from 25.77% to 2.1%.
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 10
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, then, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75624428497 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3608035611 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.25 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324741648151 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957671402999 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888557038087 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183666590725 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772971966532 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.