The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years, 1960 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate how many people worked in various areas including manufacturing, sales and services in town A and town B between 1960 and 2010.
In general, from 1960 to 2010, there was a significant increase in the percentage of people working in services sector in town A wwhile the opposite was true for other sectors. Meanwhile, in town B, manufacturing attracted the highest proportion of the workforce throughout the period.
In town A, in 1960, the proportion of people having jobs related to manufacturing was 41%, which was much higher than that of services and sales, at 29% and 30% respectively. 50 years later, these positions changed significantly/dramatically with the fact that 64% of the workforce was reported to work in services, as opposed to only 20% in manufacturing and 16% in sales.
In town B, in 1960, manufacturing accounted for the highest percentage of the workforce, at 70%, followed by 20% in sales and 10% in services. In 2010, despite a considerable decrease to 53%, manufacturing remained the most common/popular job. A slight increase was witnessed in the figures for services and sales, however, they were still lower, at 25% and 22 % respectively.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 89
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 73
- The graph below shows information about the languages that 13 year old students in one school chose to study 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11224489796 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43066851493 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561224489796 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9782641024 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278135877294 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121560986536 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10365183274 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192257203045 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892814728666 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.