The diagram below the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
The illustration highlights the advancement of Stone Age cutting tools by contrasting one made 800,000 years ago with its predecessor dating back 1.4 million years.
Overall, it is obvious that the earlier tool A looked so simple, while the later tool B was more complex. Major differences might be found in their shape, size and tips.
Looking at the diagram in more detail, the 1.4 million-year instrument was characterized by crude surfaces and rough edges. It was approximately 8 centimeters in length and had a small tip which was sharp when viewed from the back but fairly blunt in case of the front. The width of the edge was narrow, only about half that of the front.
Tool B, however, indicated a more innovative and elaborated manufacturing process, it was around 10 centimeters. The tip was more skillfully sharpened and the surface became smoother. The front view and backside looked like quite a drop of water and a triangle, respectively. This is no change made to the shape of the slide view.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health 78
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown 73
- In some countries many people suffer from health problems due to eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 78
- Parents should encourage their children to spend less time on studying and more time on physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9011627907 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84560210237 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68023255814 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0806214312 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0736439058265 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259462374359 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385747780627 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522548100233 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415271588197 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.