The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates data on different waste disposal methods (Burnt, Used as Chemicals, Recycled, Landfilled) used in the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and the U.K. Overall, it can be seen that the landfilled method is predominantly used in U.K, Spain, and Italy to manage the majority of waste whereas the Netherlands relies on recycling.
Examining the data set in more detail, it is evident that the Netherlands primarily uses recycling to dispose of approximately 68% of waste. It is the highest among all methods used in disposing of waste. To manage the rest of the waste, they basically use burning (10%), used as chemicals (10%), and landfilled methods (8%).
Italy and Spain rely on landfilled methods to dispose majority of waste, that is 40%. Burning is the second most popular method for both countries. Italy manages 22% of waste by using this method whereas in Spain, it is 30%.
Turning to the UK, it is clear that they use the landfilled method to dispose of approximately two-thirds (66%) of the total waste. They use the burning method to dispose of only 4% of waste, which is minimum value in the chart.
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in the industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons 61
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that studying literature is important for individual character building while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both point of view and provide your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87958115183 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71055569863 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1856582846 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0683851137853 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389395145375 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0204270700982 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529338153281 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200175899305 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.