the diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relvevant

Essay topics:

the diagrams below show two methods of collecting water for irrigation purposes.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relvevant.

The given diagrams depict the procedure of collecting water by two methods for irrigation purposes.
The first method is the swing basket, which uses human power. First, we need to have a well near the field that is about one to two meters deep, and we need a basket made of bamboo or leather to hold water. This method uses human power so that we need two people, and water is filled in the basket after it is taken from the well by two people with two ropes. And then water is poured into an irrigation channel to fields.
The second method is rope and bucket used by a cow that is stronger than humans. Because of using animals' power, a well is deeper than using human power, about 50 meters. This method includes a pulley, rollers and a bucket.
First, the cow stands on the top of the slope to collect water, then it walks downhill and the bucket is risen from the well. After that, water is poured into irrigation channels.
Overall, the two methods are easy to carry out. However, it relies on different depths and farmers’ economic conditions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-31 imurminhanh 87 view
2022-11-01 Ngoc21 61 view
2022-04-15 monmon12345 view
2022-01-10 Shubham07 56 view
2021-12-04 Shubham07 56 view
Essays by user JACKIE12Z3 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51041666667 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1696443881 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.83652298 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1666666667 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190688258205 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808240548996 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801790915869 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130087028678 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984423979977 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.