The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs illustrate how much money was splurged on children's sports by British parents and how many youngsters took part in three sports including football, athletics and swimming from 2008 to 2014.
As can be seen from the line graphs, there was a steady increase in the number of money spent on sports for kids throughout the surveyed period. Moreover while all three sports recorded a certain rise, it was football that had the biggest number of participants.
In particular, starting at 20 pounds per month in 2008, the fee that parents in Britain paid for their children's sporting activities' went through a steady growth over the next 6 years. It was in 2014 that the figure almost doubled the 2008's number, at about 33 pounds per month.
Furthermore, there were over 7.5 million children who played football in 2008, as against under 2.5 million and 0.5 million children enrolling in athletics and swimming respectively. While the number in football and swimming kept increasing until the end of the survey, that in athletics remained the same in the first two years before upsurging to 5 million in 2012. After that, it decreased slightly to under 5 million in 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted whereas others feel it is a medical necessity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 61
- The diagram illustrates the process of building an igloo 61
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 67
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 84
- The chart shows the amount and quality of water supplied in two regions of the world 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...or kids throughout the surveyed period. Moreover while all three sports recorded a certa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55301782211 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1449633918 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305918750231 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118730799639 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605343939073 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172265563551 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038198889067 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.