The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The charts illustrate the information about the money commuting by parents on their children's sports and the number of participants in football, athletics and swimming in Britain over a 6-year period between 2008 and 2014.
As can be seen from the charts, the trend of the amount of money spent was upward and the same as that of the numbers of football players, athletes and swimmers. The quantity of people who partook in football ranks first amongst three major sports.
In particular, only 20 pounds in the first month of 2008 was paid for children's sports. After that, the average monthly witnessed a gradual increase to almost 35 pounds at the end of the survey.
Moreover, both the trend of football members and swimmers had inconsiderable growth throughout the survey, differing by around 1.5 million and 2.5 million respectively. Meanwhile, the figure of athletics participants experienced a significant change. In the first 2 years, this remained stable at a tiny minority before rocketting to 5 million. In addition, the quantity of athletes declined slightly and stayed at the second position at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 35 pounds at the end of the survey. Moreover, both the trend of football mem...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13978494624 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81626020461 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618279569892 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8693797647 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292532112921 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101732058898 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154602538265 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189991938186 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196285589398 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.