The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The charts illustrate how much money was paid for children’s sport activities by British parents from 2008 to 2014 and the figures for children’s partaking in three sports over the same surveyed period.
As can be seen from the charts, there was an upward trend in the average monthly spending on children’s sports in tandem with the growth in the number of child attendances in football, athletes and swimming throughout the years. Moreover, football was more popular compared to the other two sports.
In particular, standing at 20 in 2008, the fee for children’s sports per month rose steadily over the next 6 years, by over 10 pounds. The same trend was recorded in the number of children participating in swimming activity, with approximately 2.4 million at the beginning of the survey before it almost doubled to 4.7 in 2014.
Turning to athletics, there were only 500 thousand children engaging in this sport in 2008. Then the figure soared to its highest point at 5 million in 2012 before falling slightly by 100 thousand in the following years. Interestingly, while football showed smallest changes in the number of children playing, from 8 million to 9 million, it remained first place among the surveyed categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- The maps below show the changes experienced by the town of Lakeside at the beginning of the 21st century 61
- In some countries young people have become richer healther and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showed the smallest'.
Suggestion: showed the smallest
...ng years. Interestingly, while football showed smallest changes in the number of children playi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10784313725 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79853452065 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622549019608 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9551697193 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316611350873 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127803448675 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115569034975 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200521417924 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120651442865 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.