The following line graph shows the three different reasons of weight exports from 1985 to 1990
The line graph compares the data of wheat exports of three regions( Australia Canada and European communities) from 1985 to 1990.
Overall, the three regions experience different trends in the time period. While, the wheat exports in Canada and European countries rose with some fluctuations, the exports in Australia fell over time.
As the graph shows, Australia’s wheat export figures started at 15 million tons in 1985 followed by a small increase to around 16 million tons in 1986. Then, it declined steadily until it feel to just over 10 million tons in 1990. Regarding Canada exports, in 1985 they shipped approximately 19 million tons of wheat. This figure fell to about 17 million in 1986, but then their exports experienced considerable growth to 25 million tons in 1988. Afterward, the figure plunged to below 15 million in 1989, before rose to just under 20 million in 1990.
By contrast, the wheat exports from European Countries experience an increase in the six-year period. In 1985, nearly 16 million tons were exported, but this number fell to about 14 million in 1986. Then, the exports increased to 15 million tons in 1987 and 1988 before witnessing a steady growth 19 million and 21 million in 1989 and 1990, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-23 | mangpahang | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | nam4904 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | amynguyen97 | 54 | view |
| 2017-10-23 | ittovo92 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any re 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... steady growth 19 million and 21 million in 1989 and 1990, respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01923076923 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61806988845 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0347190305 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9090909091 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200783518276 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947372189914 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889448718928 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170965450158 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107910535511 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.