The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990
The given line graph illustrates the weekly expenditure of fast food on 3 categories in the UK in the period from 1970 to 1990
It can be clearly seen that fish is likely to be the most popular food consumpted in the UK. In addition, there is an upward trend in the number of fish & chips and pizza expenditure, compared to a downward trend in the figure of hamburger spending during the research period.
The first striking feature observed from the graph is that the number of pizza eaten was by far highest in the UK, at more than 300 grams in 1970. By contrast,the figure for hamburger was significantly lower,at around 30 grams. Additionally, approximately 80 grams of fish&chips were eaten by UK citizens In the same year. Interestingly,the year 1982 witnessed an equal quantity in the fish&chips and pizza consumption, at about 200 grams
When it comes to 1990, fish&chips weekly consumption increased dramatically to 500 grams whereas hamburger's figure rose slightly to 300 grams. At the same time, the number of pizza spending is likely to remain stable at roughly 200 grams
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | duongpt | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | chau hoang | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Amelia_28 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph illustrates the weekly expenditure of fa...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...more than 300 grams in 1970. By contrast,the figure for hamburger was significantly ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...re for hamburger was significantly lower,at around 30 grams. Additionally, approxim...
^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...citizens In the same year. Interestingly,the year 1982 witnessed an equal quantity i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87027027027 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94064397389 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4702114411 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233036196551 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105727918304 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155944856306 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196056675985 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196390883268 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.