It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our live. How could robots be used in the future? Will this development be a positive or a negative development?
The improvement of technology is improving in every aspect, one of that is robots. In the future, robots will be used in order to ease human’s work. This essay will elaborate more on how it will be optimized in the future and explains why it can bring a lot of benefit.
First of all, it can be potentially said that technology advancement is growing quickly in order that human’s job would be replaced by technology, specifically robots. Thus, simple work such as cooking, driving and gardening would be able to be done by robots. With this, people could probably focus on other tasks, due to being replaced by robots. Furthermore, some specific job in several field like nursing and dentist could be done by robots. By this way, optimization could perhaps be done if human resource were limited.
To consider positive development, since some individuals work is replaced by robots, they can boost other work in order to maximize their income without worrying others job. For instance, many houses in Japan are completed with cleaning robots so that people do not have to focus on chores. Leading to income optimization, office workers especially woman barely consider about household work inasmuch as it is replaced by cleaning robot. Secondly, it can be surely seen that in health sector the presence of robot is advantageous. To give an idea, surgeon robot has done surgery successfully. With this, it might reduce risk since there is no human intervention during surgery process.
In conclusion, the way robots being used are replacing simple work and optimizing task. It seems to that robot usage is a positive development.
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk global language in the future Do you think this is positive or negative development 61
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment to address it at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country while some people think there are other factors should be considered Within these factors do you think anyone is more important than the others 67
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01838235294 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74464473454 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2663624237 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280868813865 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10616304985 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660461499013 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198139487914 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500637439618 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.