The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below illustrate the amount of the global water use and the water expenditure in Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo.

Overall, from 1900 to 2000, it is easy to see that the global water needs rose significantly, especially in agriculture which had the highest number in the amount of water use. We can also see that the proportion of water expenditure is dramatically higher in Brazil than in Congo.

In the first chart, the agriculture had a significant increase in water use from 500km3 to 1000km3 between 1900 and 1950, and then it continued its upward trend to reach a peak at 3000 inn 2000. While from 1900 to 1950, the industrial use and domestic use had a mild fluctuation in water needs, just nearly 1 km3, however, between 1950 and 2000, it increase swiftly to 1000km in industrial and under 500km3 in domestic.

In the second chart, in 2000, the population of Brazil was 176 million and the population of Congo was 5.2 million. Brazil’s water consumption, at 359km3, was much higher than Congo, at 8km3, it can be explained by the fact that irrigated land in brazil was 256 times higher than in Congo.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-11 Giang Tran 73 view
2023-01-07 mytinh 79 view
2022-07-13 thienhanguyen 78 view
2021-11-18 Jaydee1774 67 view
2021-11-01 niloya 73 view
Essays by user hoangdepzai3904 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...km3, however, between 1950 and 2000, it increase swiftly to 1000km in industrial and und...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75252525253 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64594894351 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.8446534357 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12817375275 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733629245278 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525239742797 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994279011674 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551438252036 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.